英文原文
Before the team meeting, the initial scores should be reviewed by the growth lead, who might see issues that the submitter of the idea hadn’t seen or appreciated. The growth lead may suggest modifications to the score based on her past experience and consultation with other team members. It’s important that the team not get bogged down in trying to fine-tune the score too much. The score is to be used for relative prioritization and will not be perfect. A growth meeting can devolve quickly if team members squabble over a test’s impact score, for example. It’s better for the team to use the score as a valued guide, rather than the be-all and end-all for test prioritization. When there is uncertainty or concern about a score, the growth lead should use her best judgment and act decisively to keep the team moving.中文译文
团队开会之前,增长负责人应当复核最初的评分,因为她可能看出想法提交者没有发现或没有充分认识到的问题。增长负责人可以根据以往经验,并与其他团队成员商量,建议调整评分。重要的是,团队不要为了过度微调分数而陷入停滞。评分用于相对优先级排序,不会完美无缺。例如,如果团队成员争执某项实验的影响评分,增长会议很快就可能变得混乱。团队最好把评分作为有用的指引,而不要把它当作确定实验优先级的全部依据。对某个分数存在疑问或顾虑时,增长负责人应运用自己最审慎的判断,果断行动,让团队继续推进。Sean Ellis, Morgan Brown · 增长黑客 · 第 4 章:高频实验 · ¶ 83
本页译文和说明由 AI 根据英文原文新写,非官方译本。章节概括、情境与赏析为编辑文字,不属于作者引文。来源链接提供书目信息,不提供上传原书的公开访问。